We also address whether the district court was required to entertain appellants' as-applied challenge to the Tax when they failed to exhaust their administrative remedies on that issue. OPINION By the Court, DOUGLAS, J.: In this opinion, we consider whether, on its face, Nevada's Live Entertainment Tax violates free speech rights under Article 1, Section 9 of the Nevada Constitution or the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Pope, Senior Deputy Attorneys General, and Vivienne Rakowsky, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondents. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Blake A. Roos, Las Vegas, for Appellant SHAC, LLC. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (5) 1947A e H VLF Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Mark E. Shafer, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants Deja Vu Showgirls of Las Vegas, LLC Little Darlings of Las Vegas K-Kel, Inc. Brown, Las Vegas Shafer and Associates and Bradley J. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, Judge. 60037 MED SEP 1 8 2014 thaer GE Appeal from a district court summary judgment rejecting a facial challenge to the constitutionality of Nevada's Live Entertainment Tax and denying injunctive relief as to the enforcement of that tax. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION NEVADA TAX COMMISSION AND THE STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF EXAMINERS, Respondents. WESTWOOD, INC., DTB/A TREASURES, Appellants, vs. 130 Nev., Advance Opinion 73 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DEJA VU SHOWGIRLS OF LAS VEGAS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, D/B/A DEJA VU SHOWGIRLS LITTLE DARLINGS OF LAS VEGAS, D/B/A LITTLE DARLINGS K-KEL, INC., D/l3/A SPEARMINT RHINO GENTLEMEN'S CLUB OLYMPUS GARDEN, INC., D/B/A OLYMPUS GARDEN SHAC, LLC, D/WA SAPPHIRE THE POWER COMPANY, INC., D/B/A CRAZY HORSE TOO GENTLEMEN'S CLUB AND D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |